Lance fessed up.
My biggest complaint for years in regards to media coverage and fan commentary about steroids in sports is about actual proof. I did not like the USADA report because it was all testimony and no proof when everyone testifying had an agenda. I believe The Mitchell Report was flawed for the same reasons.
I am critical of the recess logic of these reports, because I prefer tests. When done right tests are reliable, physical evidence. When not they are the Seahawks dilemma of one player taking the punishment and the other getting off on a technicality.
I had long hoped Lance was clean. I had hoped at least some of the baseball players were falsely accused, and I really hope I am not rooting for cheaters on the Seahawks.
I still lean towards physical evidence over finger pointing, and I am still critical of suspending athletes based solely on testimony without positive tests ...
But, when you fess up, so be it.